Glossary/Trading

Mark-to-Market

Also known as Fair-value marking

Mark-to-market is the process of revaluing an asset, liability, or position using current market prices or a defined fair-value estimate and recognizing the resulting change.

Editorially reviewed 2026-07-31

Why mark-to-market matters

Frequent valuation makes gains, losses, collateral, margin, and risk visible. It also means temporary price moves can create cash demands before an investment thesis resolves.

How it is applied

Administrators select independent prices, apply valuation hierarchies, reconcile counterparties, and approve models or overrides. Derivatives are marked regularly to determine variation margin. Revalue positions using current observable prices or approved valuation models at a defined frequency. Record unrealized gains and losses, update collateral and margin, and reconcile independent price sources. Less liquid holdings require hierarchy, reserves, model governance, and escalation when quotes conflict or become stale.

Portfolio example

A futures position gains $50,000 for the day and receives variation margin. The cash flow occurs even though the contract remains open. A futures position gains 200,000 during the day. Variation margin transfers that gain in cash, resetting contract value. A private bond valued from 98 to 92 records an unrealized loss, but cash may not move until sale, default, or a collateral requirement.

How to interpret it

A mark is an estimate of current value, not guaranteed liquidation proceeds. Observable prices are stronger evidence when markets are active and the position is small. Mark-to-market makes current economic changes visible and prevents historical cost from hiding deterioration. It can also transmit volatility into earnings, NAV, and liquidity. A quoted price is most reliable when it represents an executable trade of relevant size in an active market.

Limitations and common misconceptions

Illiquid holdings require models, bid-ask adjustments, and judgment. Prices can be stale or distressed, while funding rules may force action at unfavorable marks. Forced marking during illiquidity can reflect distressed prices, while model marks may be optimistic and untradeable. Bid versus midpoint conventions affect results. Accounting presentation can differ from risk economics. A mark is an estimate at a time and size, not a guarantee of realized proceeds. Valuation controls should define source priority, stale-price thresholds, challenge procedures, and independent review. Price-verification adjustments need transparent allocation among investors when subscriptions or redemptions occur. For leveraged portfolios, examine how mark changes flow into cash margin and covenant tests, since an unrealized accounting loss can create an immediate funding need.

Sources and further reading